Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Facebook Censorship

I don't have an account with Facebook, but from the description given by John Best on what happened to him it would appear that they apply the diplomacy rules of social engagement. I've already said on this blog that John is not a diplomat, and this is why he was blocked for 12 hours. Facebook is not a government instrumentality so they are not required to hold to the tenets of the First Amendment. That fact would make any threat by John to sue Facebook empty.

I don't know what Dave Parker's general position is on the issues at hand, but it seems that he has a good idea about free energy. He has recognized John as a nasty individual and yes, his manner is verbally violent and imputes a violent revolution. Act "Now" imputes instant action and the only instant action is a violent one. It's a shame that John is too blinded by hate to see this.

I am starting to wonder if this line of thinking may in fact be anti-semantic. The Rothschild family appears to be Jewish according to Wikipedia and John's obsession with Zionism is consistent with this. But I have nothing else to go on to prove it.

I should also address this hatred of banking, which has been detailed tremendously in this blog. It is intense and also obsessional, but whether or not there is anything to it by itself I have no clue. It would make sense given the level of obsession with the Rothschild family that there isn't.

Monday, September 9, 2013

Where the Power truly lies

I linked my last entry to John on his Autism Fraud blog, and there has been no reply. However, there have been no less than three incredible entries that further prove that he is demented. In a nutshell, he claims that his own allies are against him on Facebook, he thinks that the Russian President has some influence over United States decision making in vaccine production and yet again he thinks that his word will start a revolution by itself. I shall concentrate in this entry on the last one by correcting a number of observations he has made.

"WE have the power! WE have to stand up for ourselves and tell all of these criminal politicians to get the *&^# out of our country!!!"

There are only two ways to achieve this. Filing an action in the Courts claiming Constitutional violations, or voting against them at elections.

"WE have the power to seize the TV networks and tell each other the whole truth!"

To achieve this, we have to buy them out first.

"WE have the power to stop the illegal immigrants from coming in here and undercutting our wages to take out jobs."

To achieve this, we must increase border patrols twenty fold and also make Americans take these jobs. At present Americans are not interested in them and that is why employers want the immigrants.

"WE have the power to direct our schools to teach everyone what the bankers have done over the last 200+ years to destroy our freedoms!"

To achieve this, we must elect politicians who are willing to do this. This is aside from the fact that all the banks are doing is doing business. This is within the Constitution and to try to stop them constitutes restraint of trade.

"WE have the power to take every dime back that the bankers stole from us!"

We would have to prove theft occurred first, and in the majority of cases it has not.

"WE have the power to stop corporations like Monsanto from poisoning us with their crap they pass off as food!"

The first thing to do is to stop buying it. As long as people buy it, we do not have such a power.

"WE have the power to reopen all of our factories and make our own goods that won't fall apart in three weeks like the crap that we buy from China!"

But we do not have the power to do this at a competitive price, unless we pay the same low wages created by the illegal immigrants.

"WE have the power to tell out slimy corporations that they can't do credit checks on us, investigate what we say on the internet or tell us how we can wear our facial hair in order to work for them!"

We do have that power, and they have the power to show us the door in response to this refusal to co-operate.

"WE have the power to tell our government that WE will say whatever WE want, wherever WE want to say it, and whenever WE want to say it and that they better not even think about telling us that WE can't!"

There are however guidelines in place in general society that give just cause for us to ignore, or in extreme cases of slander or libel gag speech. The latter is of course rare.

"WE have the power to stop the planes from dropping chemicals on us!"

As long as our elected officials are prepared to do that.

"WE have the right to carry a gun any time WE want to, any kind of gun WE want and there is nothing they can say about it!"

This is true, but it comes at a cost as the children of Sandy Hook Elementary School found out last December.

"WE can put the 13th amendment back into the Constitution, keep the lawyers from ever perverting the Constitution again and repeal ever law that these lowlifes stuck us with!"

I have already addressed this in my response to John's Declaration of Independence.

"WE CAN FIX OUR COUNTRY RIGHT NOW!!!"

Indeed we can, but it requires a number of different tactics that John will not accept. He does not have the answers and as long as he effectively screams and yells like a petulant child he never will.

Monday, September 2, 2013

The Definition of Freedom, Control and so forth

I honestly believe that John Best must be a distracting puppet sent by the real enemies of Freedom and Democracy. I can not believe there could be an American who could be so detached from reality. I guess he is the sort of person who would see all that he sees as being in the same vein as the current crisis in Syria with the use of banned chemical weapons, and is seeking action. He is not going to achieve this with Zionist style rhetoric that ceased to be relevant upon the establishment of Israel.

To begin, there is much propaganda on the Internet. However the distractions are coming from malcontents like John Best. He attempts to distract and does a poor job of it because he doesn't realize that the important people realize that he is not worth the time and effort. John is in fact trying to sow the seeds of disorganization himself and undo the education that has been provided by the media to encourage us to think. That is the true definition of Freedom. If anything is hidden it is because it will not further the understanding of everything important. The majority of the United States of America know this. John does not and he tries to change the field against the majority. People who do that from such a weak position as his will be treated as he deserves. He does not have anything substantial to prove what he says is true. He only has the very propaganda he opposes, and that makes him no better that those he is trying to expose - and therefore a liar.

The channels of communication are open. We all know this to be true. CNN achieved this end and it has expanded ever since with the expansion of cable television throughout the world. Those in power know also what needs to stay secret, and this is why Wikileaks were being so disruptive within diplomatic avenues. If we need to know something we will be told. John is equally disruptive and is being treated in the same way, except that he doesn't know what is really true anymore. To call all politicians liars is not strictly a lie, but John is a politician himself as he engages in the same behavior. To call them corrupt demonstrates a lack of understanding of the political system as it stands. It may have it's issues, but as long as Americans aren't interested this will not change. John is trying to play the game instead of really trying to change it properly. As a result, no one will listen to him any more than they will listen to members of the government.

I don't know what has been happening on Facebook, but I am willing to bet that many complaints have been made about John's websites and the sites he has linked. They would be seen as offensive, abusive and inane, and a refusal to listen and learn the art of positive presentation of negative information. A form of diplomacy. John has none. He makes America look bad in the eyes of others and that is why he is being silenced legally. The other sites just want attention. They are simply using their Freedom of Speech rights and nothing more than that. It's all they are interested in. John gets banned from anywhere and everywhere because he is extraordinarily rude, extremely offensive and a full on bully.

I have already dissected his New Declaration of Independence on this blog. I would suggest that the places John has tried to contact know what I have said about it is at least partly correct in their eyes. As for John's attempt to run for President, he needs to get off his computer and travel to get his message out. There is no other way to gain attention even if it's not the sort he wants. Ron Paul, Gary Johnson and Jill Stein know this. The 88 percent who didn't sign the petition made that decision not because they like the government. They didn't sign because they knew 95 percent trash when they read it.

Now while John has a argument against the United States banking sector, he is erroneously including the Federal Reserve in this. The Fed may decide on interest rates, but it's not up to the banking sector to follow them. John clearly sees the banks and the government in cahoots, and in the case of the Republicans he would be correct. The Democrats however see the issue only to not be able to do anything about it due to the numbers in the Senate.

John is a control freak. He craves it and he doesn't have it. He is unable to handle that fact and it's why he is demented. We can all see this and it's why his message doesn't get out. For all John's efforts to stand up for himself he will forever stand alone. And that won't change unless John accepts that his present tactics are harming his stand, whether he's right or not. The sane people of planet Earth know that he's not.