Monday, August 29, 2011

How John Best has lost

For all his rhetoric, John Best refuses to accept the truth.

When the controversies first erupted through the Internet speculation over a number of factors, there was hope. It was false hope, but hope nevertheless. Parents naturally gravitated to it, believing that a cure for Autism was nigh.

But as time went on, parents began to realise that they were being sold a dud. There was no "psychopath" selling books to provide a smoke screen. Most parents were finding the real truth was not what they'd been led to believe. They were finding out that they had been conned, and valuable time had been wasted.
John Best is the only con man left. He's the only one who still believes the junk that everyone else has moved on from. He's lost, and he's too stubborn to realize this to be true.

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

CDC Propaganda?

I'd like to know how John Best was able to get from Londonderry to Concord and back with an Autistic son! That's neglect for God's sakes!

The CDC is doing the right thing with vaccines. There are many diseases about including Hepatitus B, which is on the schedule because it's not a doctor's job to decipher if the mother or the father are drug addicts. It's none of their business. So the assumption has to be that everyone has contact at least, so the newborn baby is vulnerable. It's the same with other diseases that John attempts to downplay.

Downplaying preventable diseases as a threat to children is an act of cruelty. It is also a propaganda effort that can only cost lives. The CDC should order John's blog to be shut down as a health threat.

Saturday, August 6, 2011

Editing Wikipedia

John Best will never be able to contribute to Wikipedia. This is why, and I am quoting from their rules of civility;

Civility is part of Wikipedia's code of conduct and one of Wikipedia's five pillars. The civility policy is a standard of conduct that sets out how Wikipedia editors should interact. Stated simply, editors should always treat each other with consideration and respect. In order to keep the focus on improving the encyclopedia and to help maintain a pleasant editing environment, editors should behave politely, calmly and reasonably, even during heated debates.

This policy describes the standards of behavior expected of users when they interact, and appropriate ways of dealing with problems that may arise. It applies to all editors and all interaction on Wikipedia, including on user and article talk pages, in edit summaries, and in any other discussion with or about fellow Wikipedians.

Now then, this is the edit that John is complaining about that should have been allowed;

This Wikipedia page is pure bullshit. It is obvious that these lies about vaccines were written by liars associated with the medical industry. Anyone who studies this issue knows beyond any doubt that mercury in vaccines kills brain cells, causes spontaneous miscarriages and is the primamry cause of autism and Alzheimer's Disease.

Civility totally lacking, so of course the edit was reversed and John warned. That rule is there to stop crazy divot heads like him from editing. Truth requires civility as well as accuracy and John is not capable of either. That's why when he reported this incident to Generation Rescue, he was summarily scuttled.